First, Formalities – Then, Bloody Vengeance

In feudal Japan, revenge was not an impulse. It was a duty, a ritual, and at the same time a cold legal construct deeply embedded in the pillars of the Tokugawa shogunate’s order. In the Edo period (1603–1868), when the country, after centuries of war, sank into relative peace, the justice system did not eliminate the need for retaliation – on the contrary, it legalized it, surrounded it with rules, and made it an act that was almost sacred. Katakiuchi (仇討ち) – revenge upon the killer of a family member – was not only acceptable but expected. Those who failed to fulfill the obligation of avenging their father, lord, or brother brought shame and ridicule upon their clan and often, in an act of disgrace, chose seppuku. But interestingly – the shogun embraced katakiuchi within a full administrative procedure. A samurai who wished to legally kill his enemy had to submit a special petition (katakiuchi gansho) to the local authorities, present witnesses and justification, and await permission from the machi-bugyō. He even received a special certificate – katakiuchi menkyo – bearing the seal of the shogunate – a license to kill.

Thus, it was not an act of wild violence but a social ritual sanctified by law. The conditions were strict: revenge had to be carried out without outside help, alone or with one’s brother, never with hired men. The enemy had to know he was being pursued – no ambushes, poisons, or sneak attacks. The killing had to be carried out in broad daylight, in front of witnesses, preferably in a public place, and after it was done, the avenger had to immediately report with the body (or just the head) to the nearest shogunate office. If everything was done according to the rules, the revenge was deemed just, and the perpetrator was acquitted. If not – imprisonment or even death (or forced seppuku) could follow. The time limit to exact vengeance was 20 years from the moment of the unjust killing. The system was so precise that there were cases where children – even teenage girls – swore oaths of revenge and, as they grew, tracked their fathers’ killers for years and trained to strike at the right moment. Such was the case of a girl named Okiko from the Takanashi clan, whom her mother trained for years and who, in 1703, at the age of 14, killed her father’s murderer – and was praised by the authorities for "fulfilling the duty of the clan."

Paradoxically, in an era of pacification and control, in which the Tokugawa shogunate monopolized violence, it was katakiuchi – an act of death – that became one of the few ways an individual could exact justice on behalf of the family. Though steeped in blood and sword, katakiuchi spoke more of order than chaos. It was at once legalistic and emotional, cold as steel and hot as the grief of loss. That is why it continues to fascinate – as a story of how a society built on hierarchy, honor, and ritual tried to tame the most primal impulse: the desire for revenge.

Prologue: Blood on the Snow

– The Igagoe Revenge Story

伊賀越の仇討ち

The morning was icy, and the frozen ground gave a distinctive, crisp sound beneath the waraji sandals. Icicles hung from the rooftops of Kuwana-juku, a post station on the Tōkaidō road, and thin smoke lazily rose from the roof of a teahouse. A man dressed in a modest kamishimo (traditional formal samurai attire), with a katana and wakizashi at his side, stood in the square before Honshō-ji Temple. The year was 1634, and this was to be the moment when honor and life would hang in the balance.

The young samurai Wada Shizuma (和田静馬) stood face to face with the target of his revenge – a man named Kawai Matagorō (河合又五郎), the murderer of his half-brother, Wada Kinjūrō.

Death and Oath

Two years earlier, in Nara, Kawai Matagorō had killed Kinjūrō during a quarrel over a woman. Matagorō was a man of influence – his father served as a hatamoto (a direct vassal of the shogun). When the crime came to light, Matagorō fled Nara and for the next several years hid, moving between Ise, Mino, and Mikawa Provinces.

Wada Shizuma could not allow his brother’s murder to go unanswered. But as a samurai of the Tokugawa era, he could not act in passion or pursue private revenge. He therefore submitted an official katakiuchi gansho (仇討ち願書) – a written petition to the local machi-bugyō (magistrate), requesting permission to exact revenge.

It was not just a duty to his family. In Edo-period society, where peace reigned and the sword had become more a symbol of status than a weapon of war, katakiuchi (clan revenge) was one of the few remaining expressions of the old ideals of the warrior code (now, in the Edo period, known as bushidō). The law recognized revenge as legal – but only if the samurai acted in accordance with the principles laid out by legal regulations.

A Ritual of Justice

Shizuma tracked Matagorō for two years. He was accompanied by several men, including his uncle Araki Mataemon (荒木又右衛門) – a legendary swordsman from Iga, known for his mastery of the blade. When they finally discovered that Matagorō had stopped in Kuwana, they prepared for the attack. In winter. In broad daylight. Face to face – as the law required.

The rules of katakiuchi were strict:
► Revenge could not be an ambush or night attack.
► It had to occur publicly, with witnesses present.
► No bystanders could be harmed.
► The avenger had to report to the authorities afterward and present evidence.

Shizuma and Araki attacked Matagorō and his men in front of Honshō-ji Temple. The swish of the katana pierced the winter air. Ice cracked beneath the feet of the combatants. Matagorō fought fiercely, but in the end, he fell, pierced by Araki’s blade. Revenge was achieved. The snow in the square turned first pink, then crimson.

Justice and Closure

After the battle, Wada Shizuma and Araki Mataemon voluntarily reported to the authorities. They submitted a full report, presented witnesses, and referred to their prior katakiuchi gansho petition. Their actions were deemed lawful. Instead of punishment, they received praise. Araki Mataemon became a hero, and his mastery of kenjutsu brought him fame.

The Cold Morality of Feudal Law

Though it may appear barbaric through modern eyes, in Edo-period Japan, such a deed was an act of moral courage – and often even an absolute duty. For a samurai who failed to avenge the dishonored family honor, life became difficult – or even, quite literally – impossible. Social pressure, family expectations, the spirits of the ancestors – all demanded action. Katakiuchi was not merely revenge – it was service to the family name, a ritual of purification, a legacy of a warlike past in a time of peace.

In the shadow of Honshō-ji Temple, under the steel-gray sky of a harsh winter, Shizuma repaid his debt – to his dead brother, to his ancestors, to the honor of his clan. Having fulfilled his revenge, he was free, for the first time in two years.

What Does Katakiuchi Mean?

The term 仇討ち (katakiuchi), translated as "revenge for a wrong" or "samurai vendetta," consists of two kanji characters, each carrying essential meaning:

  ► 仇 (kataki) – means enemy or adversary, and in the context of katakiuchi, it refers specifically to the killer of a father, brother, lord, or another close family member. This is not a random foe—it is someone whose deed has left a moral wound that demands purification. In the Japanese language, this character can also carry a more abstract tone—meaning “hatred” or “grudge.”

  ► 討ち (uchi) – comes from the verb utsu (討つ), which literally means "to strike," "to defeat," or "to kill." Combined with 仇, it forms a concept of a ritual act—a literal realization of justice through spilled blood.

There is also a variant of this term: 敵討ち (tekiuchi), where 敵 (teki) also means “enemy.” In practice, both forms were used interchangeably, though 仇討ち (katakiuchi) carried stronger connotations of personal loss and a blood-bound duty.

Other Terms Related to Clan Revenge

  ► 本懐 (honkai) – literally means "the fulfillment of a true desire," but in the context of katakiuchi, it signifies the spiritual completion of a duty whose fulfillment was the avenger’s life goal. Achieving honkai meant one could die without regret—not as a killer, but as a loyal son, a faithful vassal.

  ► 仇討ち免許 (katakiuchi menkyo) – the formal permission issued by the bakufu (shogunate government—see more here: What to Do with a Society of Samurai Who Only Know War and Death in Times of Peace? - The Clever Ideas of the Tokugawa Shoguns) to carry out an act of revenge. This document was akin to a legal sword: it protected the avenger from being treated as a murderer but imposed strict rules on how the act must be conducted—prohibiting assassination, poison, ambushes, or nighttime attacks.

  ► 御公儀 (gokōgi) – the term for the institutional apparatus of justice that decided whether the right to avenge would be granted, reviewed how the act was carried out, and issued rulings. It was at the machi-bugyōsho magistrates’ offices that testimonies were analyzed, and the samurai-avenger had to present witnesses, evidence, and the detailed execution of the katakiuchi.

The Law of the Samurai – Shogunate Regulations

When Tokugawa Ieyasu assumed the title of shōgun in 1603 and, after decades of civil war, established a new order, his primary goal was national stability. The peace of the Tokugawa era lasted for more than two and a half centuries, but peace—as people said then—did not erase old wrongs. The old ideals of loyalty, clan devotion, and duty to ancestors did not disappear, and revenge (katakiuchi) remained—not as a wild act of personal fury, but as a ritualized and strictly regulated legal practice.

In a state built on hierarchy, where everyone knew their place—from peasant to daimyō—the Tokugawa bakufu government knew it could not uproot the tradition of blood vendettas. Instead, it chose to tame it, surround it with procedures, and weave it into the machinery of law. Katakiuchi became a ritual under government supervision—an act permitted, but hedged with numerous conditions.

Procedures and Formal Requirements

To avenge someone legally, it was not enough to grab a sword and shout, “For my father!” Every act of katakiuchi had to be pre-registered. A relative of the murdered—usually a son, brother, or retainer—had to submit a petition, called 仇討ち願書 (katakiuchi gansho), to the appropriate authorities. This was a written declaration of the intent to seek revenge, containing information about the victim, the suspected killer, the circumstances of the death, and a formal vow to cleanse the family’s name.

This petition was submitted to:
  ► machi-bugyō – a municipal official in cities under the direct control of the bakufu, such as Edo, Ōsaka, or Kyōto;
  ► han-bugyō – the local authority in a given han (domain), if the matter concerned samurai outside the territory directly ruled by the shogunate.

After the petition was submitted and approved, a 仇討ち免許 (katakiuchi menkyo) was issued—a kind of license for revenge. From that moment, the avenger became a legally protected executor of the family duty.

Requirements for Legal Validity

The bakufu created a system so strict and detailed that only the most determined and honorable were willing to follow it. These were the rules that had to be followed without exception:

  ► Mandatory Registration – revenge carried out without prior submission of a gansho was treated as simple murder.
  ► Approval of the Clan Head – no one could act independently. The blessing of the clan head (家長 kachō) had to be obtained, to ensure the act would not bring dishonor to the entire family.
  ► No Third-Party Involvement – the katakiuchi had to be performed by the avenger themselves. Hiring killers, requesting help from other samurai, or especially from commoners, was forbidden.
  ► Public Nature of the Act – the killing had to be face-to-face, with no ambush, in daylight. Killing at night, by poisoning, or in hiding was punishable by death—even if the petition had been approved.
  ► Time Limit – the license for revenge expired 20 years after the crime. After this time, the victim was considered a "spirit of the past," whose wrongs could no longer be cleansed.

The Role of Officials and Post-Act Reports

After executing the revenge, the avenger did not flee—but with a sword still warm with blood, he would go to the office of the machi-bugyō. There, he submitted a written report (報告書 hōkokusho) of the entire incident: location, date, witnesses, form of the fight. Often, he was accompanied by the body of the enemy, brought on a stretcher, to prove that the mission had succeeded.

Officials assessed whether the act complied with the terms of the menkyo. If everything was in order, the avenger was declared not guilty of any criminal act. In some cases, however, if the form of revenge raised doubts, it could result in imprisonment, financial penalties, or even an order to commit seppuku.

The system was unforgiving to those who overstepped its bounds. In 1683, the son of a samurai from the Mito han carried out unauthorized revenge, attacking his father’s killer at night with the help of a servant. Even though the victim was truly guilty and the revenge technically justified, the act was classified as a katakiuchi "in a disgraceful form." The avenger was beheaded in a public square, and his body was displayed at the execution grounds in Edo as a warning to others.

Revenge as a Duty Toward the Ancestors

In the Edo period, katakiuchi was not a private affair. It was a ritual of collective clan memory, an act of name purification, and a proof of loyalty not only to the deceased but to the entire social order. In a society where a person’s worth was measured by loyalty and honor, the avenger was not a murderer – he was the living extension of justice.

That the Tokugawa allowed such a form of violence is not a sign of weak law, but of a deep understanding of the samurai ethos. For in Edo-period Japan, blood would be shed regardless – the only question was whether in a legally regulated way or surrendered to the chaos of emotion.

Katakiuchi – What Did Society Think?

In Edo-period Japan, revenge was not merely a response to death – it was a deeply rooted social obligation, a reflex that went beyond individual emotion. Katakiuchi was not an outburst of anger, but a cold decision made with the clan, the ancestors, and heritage in mind. For a samurai who did not avenge the death of a father, brother, or lord, disgrace was a greater pain than the loss itself (in theory, according to the ideal of the ethos – of course, we do not claim it was always so in reality).

In a society based on honor, loyalty, and hierarchy, earthly justice became a symbolic extension of the moral order of the universe. A crime was not only a breach of law but a rupture in harmony – one that had to be restored, preferably with the blade of a sword.

Public Opinion: Glorification or Cautionary Tale?

Revenge, though surrounded by ritual and regulation, also lived in the hearts of the people. Contemporary accounts, chronicles, songs, and stories often portrayed avengers as great heroes – noble warriors who, despite the risk of death and the passage of years, remained faithful.

But this cult had another side. In merchant districts, where people were far removed from samurai ethics, katakiuchi was often spoken of in whispers – with admiration, but also with fear.

The Role of Witnesses and Ceremony – A Testament of Intention

For revenge to have value in the eyes of others, it had to be visible and pure in form. That is why such importance was placed on the presence of witnesses – most often other samurai, lower-ranking officials, and sometimes even priests. Their presence confirmed that the act of revenge had been performed with honor, without deceit or betrayal.

Often, just before the act itself, a small ceremony would take place in which the avenger delivered a short speech, declared his intent, and identified the person he intended to strike down. Sometimes both sides – the avenger and the target – knew each other and might even exchange bows before the duel.

Such ritual gestures had social meaning: to cleanse the blood through form, to give the brutal act an aesthetic and moral shape.

A Contrast with Christian Forgiveness – A Mentality Without Mercy

To the Western mind, shaped by the Christian notion of forgiveness, katakiuchi may seem barbaric. But in Tokugawa-era Japan, forgiveness was not a virtue – it was a weakness. Loyalty mattered more than mercy, and the memory of a wrong was proof of devotion.

The contrast is clearly visible in how victims’ families were treated: if a son did not avenge his father, he lost face, and his family risked social exclusion. In a culture where the concepts of on (恩 – debt of gratitude) and giri (義理 – moral obligation) shaped relationships, forgiveness could be interpreted as a violation of one’s duty to the deceased. It was not the murderer who shamed the family, but the son who forgave his father’s killer.

Impact on Clan Status – Regaining Face or Dishonor Through Inaction

It was not only the avenger, but the entire clan who either gained or lost as a result of the revenge. A successful katakiuchi, especially one carried out publicly and with ritual, restored face. For decades, such deeds were spoken of with respect, and the children of the avenger could expect good marriages, positions, and social recognition.

On the other hand, failure to act after a loved one's death could lead not only to social condemnation but to the internal disintegration of the clan. There were cases where entire branches of a family were considered “tainted” – and although no formal punishment followed, no one wished to form alliances or marriages with such families.

Suicide as an Alternative in the Absence of Revenge

In the most tragic cases, when for any reason revenge could not be carried out—if, for example, the target had already died, found refuge with a powerful protector, or too many years had passed—the avenger had only one option: honorable suicide (seppuku—read more about it here: Samurai Seppuku: Ritual Suicide in the Name of Honor, or Bloody Belly Cutting and Hours of Agony?).

This was an act of washing away the guilt of one’s own helplessness, but also a gesture of solidarity with the deceased—a confirmation that the bond had not been forgotten. Such an act of seppuku, though extreme, restored social balance: the community saw that the clan had not neglected its duty, and that the descendants of the deceased had not turned their backs on his spirit.

In this way, katakiuchi became not only a legal mechanism, but also a social and spiritual ceremony that—like a nō theatre performance—expressed the hidden tensions, values, and fears of samurai society. Blood spilled in broad daylight was meant to heal invisible wounds—those that ached in memory, in shame, and in the silence that followed an unjust death.

Stories of Women Who Carried Out Katakiuchi

Although the image of katakiuchi—revenge for a slain father, brother, or lord—is most often associated with a man in kamishimo, a katana at his side, and a face tense with determination, the history of Japan also knows women who broke the silence of mourning and reached for the sword. Their deeds, though rarer, were all the more shocking, inspiring, and remembered—for they violated not only gender norms but the social expectations of feminine "gentleness."

Below we present historically authentic or semi-legendary cases of female katakiuchi carried out in accordance with bakufu regulations. These are stories of courage, persistence, and boundless loyalty to one’s clan.

Okiku of Owari – Revenge of a Teenage Girl

In 1686, in the domain of Owari (present-day Aichi Prefecture), a shocking case of revenge carried out by a woman—a child, in fact—took place. A girl named Okiku, just fourteen years old and the daughter of a samurai murdered by another warrior, personally delivered the fatal blow to her father’s killer.

The entire act followed the proper ritual—Okiku’s mother submitted a katakiuchi gansho (仇討ち願書), a formal petition for permission to exact revenge, and Okiku was trained in the use of the wakizashi. When the day of the encounter arrived, the girl attacked her target in the presence of witnesses, in the courtyard of a temple. To the astonishment of those watching (though not to her mother, who knew the girl had trained in martial arts under her father since childhood), the fourteen-year-old overcame and dealt the killing blow to her opponent.

The machi-bugyō authorities in Edo ruled the act legal and praiseworthy. The story was recorded in chronicles and immortalized in jōruri (puppet theatre) and kabuki plays. From that time on, Okiku became a symbol of loyalty and courage—despite her youth and gender. The case was widely publicized as an example of youthful heroism and devotion to one’s clan.

Nakamura Tome – The Widow of Honjō

In 1831, in the Honjō district of Edo, the widow of a samurai named Nakamura, a woman named Tome, decided to avenge his death at the hands of a treacherous subordinate. Although women were not formally obligated to carry out katakiuchi, Tome insisted—she submitted a petition to the han-bugyō of her clan, who granted her a special exception.

For two years, Tome kept her target under discreet surveillance, training in secret with the help of a retired ashigaru. Finally, during a hanami (cherry blossom viewing) in Asakusa, she attacked the murderer with a wakizashi hidden in the sleeve of her kimono. He died on the spot.

Though the act technically violated the rule of public execution (the presence of multiple witnesses), the authorities ruled that Tome's action was consistent with honor and loyalty. She was allowed to retain her husband’s estate and was not ordered to commit seppuku, which in other cases might have been considered.

(This story is likely, as it appears in several early Meiji sources, although definitive historical proof is lacking.)

Two Sisters from Sendai – Clan Revenge

In 1722, in Sendai, a brutal murder was committed against a vassal of the Date clan. Two sisters, Otsuyu and Omina, daughters of the slain samurai, resolved to avenge their father's death (their younger brother was still an infant at the time).

With the help of their uncle, they prepared for the ritual act of revenge. Disguised as men, with cropped hair and light armor, they caught their father’s killer during his journey to Edo. Their deed was recorded in local chronicles as an example of ultimate loyalty.

Despite the unofficial nature of the revenge and the violation of several rules (no prior permission, female involvement in combat), the Sendai han refused to punish them. On the contrary—they were honored as symbols of bushidō virtues, and a small memorial plaque was erected for them in Daijō-ji Temple.

(Opinions are divided as to whether this is a socially sanctified legend from the Edo period or an authentic historical account.)

Why Were These Cases Possible?

Although bushidō and Edo-period law did not explicitly foresee a role for women in katakiuchi, real life was always richer than the written code. When a woman came from a samurai family and there was no man capable of carrying out revenge, social pressure and the ethos of loyalty allowed for exceptions.

There were also situations in which women supported men preparing for katakiuchi—as trainers, advisors, informants, and sometimes even requested to be included in the act itself. In many cases, a woman could also pass the responsibility to a child—as the mother of a future avenger, she nurtured in them memory, anger, and a sense of duty, just as Okiku’s mother did.

Revenge carried out by a woman evoked twofold reactions in the Edo period—admiration and fear. On one hand, a woman willing to risk her life to avenge a loved one shattered the stereotype of submissiveness. She disrupted the social order by entering a space reserved for men.

This is why many stories of female katakiuchi carried an almost theatrical quality—full of drama, surprise, and mysticism. In certain kabuki plays, a woman’s revenge was accompanied by the intervention of gods or ancestral spirits—as if the supernatural world itself demanded justice where human order had failed.

Katakiuchi as a Mirror of the Edo Era

By the 1860s, as the foundations of the old order began to tremble and a modern Meiji state appeared on the horizon, the blade of samurai vengeance gradually fell silent. Katakiuchi, which for centuries had been regarded as a ritual of justice and an act of supreme devotion to the clan, was now recast in the language of a semi-democratic modern state, where the monopoly on punishment belonged to the apparatus of government.

In 1873, Japanese authorities officially declared personal revenge a crime. A samurai who, just a decade earlier, could proudly appear before a machi-bugyō after killing an enemy and expect praise or formal acquittal, now stood as a defendant, not a hero. It was no longer possible to submit a katakiuchi gansho, because even the most ceremonial revenge was now a violation of the new penal code.

But the echo of the blade did not fall silent. It endured in literature, in kabuki theatre, and in stories passed down within families. The tale of Chūshingura still moves readers—the story of the forty-seven rōnin, who, though acting on the edge of the law, became moral archetypes of loyalty, courage, and readiness to die. Their tale has been adapted numerous times and interpreted in many forms. The legacy of katakiuchi no longer lives in actions, but in hearts and narratives—as testimony to an era in which emotion was not the enemy of law, but part of its fabric.

Katakiuchi was never just about killing an enemy—it was about killing him in such a way that the world would recognize the act as justice, not murder. It is not merely a relic of a feudal past but a mirror of dilemmas that still resonate with us today: how to reconcile law with emotion, the system with the fate of the individual, the cold liturgy of statutes with the burning fire of perceived injustice.

We do not look to the past in order to imitate it—but to better understand the present. That is why katakiuchi deserves to be remembered, though that does not mean it must be admired.

>> SEE ALSO SIMILAR ARTICLES:

The Tokugawa Shōgunate After the Fall of Samurai Japan – How They Survived the 20th Century and What They Do Today?

Wakizashi – The Smaller Cousin of the Katana That Bore the Full Weight of Samurai Honor

Discover the Katana – The Birth, Maturity, Wartime Life, and Noble Old Age of the Samurai Sword

10 Facts About Samurai That Are Often Misunderstood: Let's Discover the Real Person Behind the Armor

The Shogun Introduces Animal Cruelty Laws in 17th-Century Edo Japan

"Strong Japanese Women"

see book by the author

of the page

    未開    ソビエライ

 An enthusiast of Asian culture with a deep appreciation for the diverse philosophies of the world. By education, a psychologist and philologist specializing in Korean studies. At heart, a programmer (primarily for Android) and a passionate technology enthusiast, as well as a practitioner of Zen and mono no aware. In moments of tranquility, adheres to a disciplined lifestyle, firmly believing that perseverance, continuous personal growth, and dedication to one's passions are the wisest paths in life. Author of the book "Strong Women of Japan" (>>see more)

Personal motto:

"The most powerful force in the universe is compound interest." - Albert Einstein (probably)

  Mike Soray

   (aka Michał Sobieraj)

未開    ソビエライ

 An enthusiast of Asian culture with a deep appreciation for the diverse philosophies of the world. By education, a psychologist and philologist specializing in Korean studies. At heart, a programmer (primarily for Android) and a passionate technology enthusiast, as well as a practitioner of Zen and mono no aware. In moments of tranquility, adheres to a disciplined lifestyle, firmly believing that perseverance, continuous personal growth, and dedication to one's passions are the wisest paths in life. Author of the book "Strong Women of Japan" (>>see more)

Personal motto:

"The most powerful force in the universe is compound interest." - Albert Einstein (probably)

Mike Soray

(aka Michał Sobieraj)

Write us...

Ciechanów, Polska

dr.imyon@gmail.com

___________________

inari.smart

Would you like to share your thoughts or feedback about our website or app? Leave us a message, and we’ll get back to you quickly. We value your perspective!